Prediction of Natela Dzalamidze vs Cindy Burger Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Dzalamidze vs C. Burger

Natela Dzalamidze

GEO

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'6" (1.70m)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

245

Best Rank

134

Total Title

YTD Titles

$2.9K

Career Money

$44.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Cindy Burger

NED

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'6" (1.70m)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

245

Best Rank

134

Total Title

YTD Titles

$2.9K

Career Money

$44.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Dzalamidze 1 - 1 Burger

They have played 6 sets in total, with Natela Dzalamidze winning 3 and Cindy Burger winning 3. The last match between Cindy Burger and Natela Dzalamidze was at the Cairns, 05-10-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Burger getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Dzalamidze	1
Burger	1

Last H2H Matches:

(QF) Cairns(10-05-15)

Stats

Cindy Burger

Natela Dzalamidze

(SF) Navi Mumbai(12-15-14)

Stats

Natela Dzalamidze

Cindy Burger

N. Dzalamidze vs C. Burger H2H Profile

N. Dzalamidze	Stats	C. Burger
$2,896	Career Prize Money	$44,173
59.35% (200-137)	Career Total W/L	58.66% (325-229)
1	Hard	1
10	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Dzalamidze vs C. Burger Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Natela Dzalamidze has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cindy Burger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Natela Dzalamidze, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cindy Burger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Natela Dzalamidze has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cindy Burger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Natela Dzalamidze has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cindy Burger winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Natela Dzalamidze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 104/56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 17/17). Cindy Burger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 283/180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
Player level: In the last year, Natela Dzalamidze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cindy Burger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Natela Dzalamidze winning 1 times and Cindy Burger being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Natela Dzalamidze winning 3 and Cindy Burger winning 3.
The last match between Natela Dzalamidze and Cindy Burger was at the Cairns, 05-10-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Burger getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:30.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Natela Dzalamidze and Cindy Burger have played a deciding set 2 times, with Natela Dzalamidze winning 1 times and Cindy Burger 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Natela Dzalamidze has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cindy Burger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Natela Dzalamidze has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cindy Burger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Natela Dzalamidze has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cindy Burger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Natela Dzalamidze vs Cindy Burger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Dzalamidze vs C. Burger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Dzalamidze	Stats	C. Burger
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	3
27	Games Won	31
2	Aces (Total)	0
3	Total Double Faults	3
1:3:30	Average Match Time	1:3:30
54% (43/80)	1st Serve %	70% (57/82)
58% (25/43)	1st Serve Win %	65% (37/57)
38% (14/37)	2nd Serve Win %	28% (7/25)
55% (6/11)	Break Pts Won %	54% (7/13)
46% (38/82)	Return Points Win %	51% (41/80)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Dzalamidze Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 Oeiras - 19-04-2021
Q1 Sina HerrmannS. Herrmann	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
W15 Sharm El Sheikh - 26-10-2020
Q1 Katarina KuzmovaK. Kuzmova	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
W25 Moscow - 24-02-2020
Q3 Daria KruzhkovaD. Kruzhkova	L	7-6(5) 6-1	Stats
Q1 Martyna KubkaM. Kubka	W	4-6 6-4 10-5	Stats
W25 Kazan - 20-01-2020
Q1 Ekaterina KazionovaE. Kazionova	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Burger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 The Hague - 28-06-2021
Q1 Demi TranD. Tran	L	w/o	Stats
W15 Alkmaar - 21-06-2021
R2 Natalia SzabaninN. Szabanin	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Sinja KrausS. Kraus	W	7-6(1) 6-1	Stats
W25 Frydek Mistek - 14-09-2020
QF Raluca Georgiana SerbanR. Georgiana	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
R2 Jesika MaleckovaJ. Maleckova	W	7-6(1) 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Dzalamidze vs C. Burger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Dzalamidze	Stats	C. Burger
59.35% (200/137)	YTD Win/Loss	58.66% (325/229)
58.64% (448/316)	Sets Win/Loss	58.03% (737/533)
53.97% (3682/3140)	Games Win/Loss	53.74% (6273/5400)
65.00% (104/56)	Hard Win/Loss	51.92% (27/25)
54.69% (70/58)	Clay Win/Loss	61.12% (283/180)
52.38% (22/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (14/21)
57.14% (4/3)	Grass Win/Loss	25.00% (1/3)
0.07	Aces Per Game	0.08
249	Aces Total	432
0.11	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
351	Total Double Faults	1116
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
620.76	Average Opponent Rank	619.05
56% (2981/5330)	1st Serve %	56% (9662/17288)
64% (1898/2981)	1st Serve Win %	63% (6060/9662)
43% (1021/2349)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (3346/7626)
46% (297/645)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (1155/2345)
45% (2447/5488)	Return Points Win %	48% (8292/17235)
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	18.18% (2/9)
33.33% (2/4)	Main Tour W/L	48.39% (15/16)
49.16% (88/91)	Challenger W/L	57.41% (186/138)
72.37% (110/42)	Futures W/L	64.89% (122/66)
59% (195/332)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (322/542)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
52% (22/42)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	45% (54/119)
43% (42/97)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (86/173)
85% (210/179)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (331/277)
15% (210/31)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (331/52)
15% (125/19)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (221/48)